Can't find what you're looking for? Try another search!
With product complexity increasing, and consumer demand for more sophisticated technology growing, taking a stronger approach to requirements traceability without further burdening your team may seem like a challenge. In reality, the risk is not adapting.
For many companies trying to push the edges of what a product can do, simply getting something to market is an enormous effort. Here are some compelling reasons to go next gen.
Grifols increases efficiency and cuts costs by optimizing their requirements and risk management process with Jama Connect.
Even the most affordable, desperately needed software will have to prove itself to decision-makers and fellow employees — not just once, but many times.
The Agile methodology offers medical device developers options that anticipate and prevent the bottlenecking and potential crisis points to which static development models are normally vulnerable.
You’ll gain more confidence that your recently-released products avoid recalls, fines, or worse if you perform failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) as part of your risk management.
Poorly-written requirements can cause a lot of problems in software development, and sometimes the symptoms can be traced back to requirements gathering.
Devices recalled nationwide are typically taken to task for usability issues that could have been prevented with proper usability testing throughout a product’s development lifecycle.
Frost & Sullivan recently released a report on the challenges regulated industries face and how modern requirements management can help.
No one sets out to create a product that’s an abject failure, which is one of the reasons Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) exists.